Evaluation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission in the Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Kim,  Ji Hoon; Lee,  Ki Bong; Koo,  Yong Chul; Hong,  Seong Ah; Lee,  Yuree; Son,  Eun Jin

Original Article

Electrophysiology

Korean Journal of Audiology 2011;15(2):81-84.

Evaluation of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission in the Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Ji Hoon Kim, Ki Bong Lee, Yong Chul Koo, Seong Ah Hong, Yuree Lee, Eun Jin Son

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ejson@yuhs.ac

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Newborn Hearing Screening (NHS) program aims to identify babies at risk of hearing loss and provide appropriate rehabilitation within the crucial period for language development. The risk of hearing loss in increased in babies discharged from neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) compared to wellbaby nursery. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) or automated auditory brainstem response tests are utilized. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcome of NHS using TEOAE as initial evaluation method in NICU graduates. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: TEOAE was performed as initial screening method for NHS in NICU neonates born between February 2010 and November 2011. Babies referred from TEOAE were reevaluated with repeated TEOAE or auditory brainstem response. Referral rates were estimated and quality indicators for screening (Joint Committee on Infant Hearing position statement, 2007) were evaluated.
RESULTS
Among 149 neonates graduated from NICU, 50 (33.6%) babies failed initial TEOAE ('refer'). A second stage TEOAE testing was performed in 41 (82.0%) of these babies: 35 (85.4%) passed and 6 (14.6%) were referred for diagnostic testing. From 2-stage TEOAE screening program, 6 neonates were referred for diagnostic audiological evaluation: sensorineural hearing loss was identified in 2 babies and 3 babies were lost to follow up. Quality indicators for screening were as follows: 1) 94.0% of all newborn infants admitted to NICU completed screening by 1 month of age, and 2) 4.0% of all newborn infants who fail initial screening and fail any subsequent rescreening before comprehensive audiological evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS
Timely and adequate screening of hearing loss is prerequisite for accurate diagnosis and appropriate rehabilitation in infants especially from NICU. Further refinement of the current NHS with additional reliable screening technology is required for more stable and successful screening program.

Keywords: Neonates;Hearing screening;Hearing loss;Transient evoked otoacoustic emission

REFERENCES

American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007;120:898-921.
Yoshinaga-Itano C, Gravel JS. The evidence for universal newborn hearing screening. Am J Audiol 2001;10:62-4.
Korres SG, Balatsouras DG, Gkoritsa E, Eliopoulos P, Rallis E, Ferekidis E. Success rate of newborn and follow-up screening of hearing using otoacoustic emissions. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:1039-43.
van Straaten HL, Hille ET, Kok JH, Verkerk PH; Dutch NICU Neonatal Hearing Screening Working Group. Implementation of a nation-wide automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening programme in neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr 2003;92:332-8.
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. 1994 position statement. ASHA 1994;36:38-41.
Joint Committee on Infant Hearing; American Academy of Audiology; American Academy of Pediatrics; American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. Pediatrics 2000;106:798-817.
Hille ET, van Straaten HI, Verkerk PH; Dutch NICU Neonatal Hearing Screening Working Group. Prevalence and independent risk factors for hearing loss in NICU infants. Acta Paediatr 2007;96:1155-8.
Vohr BR, Widen JE, Cone-Wesson B, Sininger YS, Gorga MP, Folsom RC, et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: characteristics of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit and well-baby nursery. Ear Hear 2000;21:373-82.
Lim HW, Han MW, Lee HS, Kim KS, Chung JW, Kim YJ, et al. The validity using two-stage automated auditory brainstem response as a universal newborn hearing screening protocol: experiences in Asan medical center. Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2007;50:108-14.
Park HJ, Park KH, Oh JH, Lee JS. TEOAE as a Newborn Hearing Screening. Korean J Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 1999;42:565-9.
Ohl C, Dornier L, Czajka C, Chobaut JC, Tavernier L. Newborn hearing screening on infants at risk. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:1691-5.
Suppiej A, Rizzardi E, Zanardo V, Franzoi M, Ermani M, Orzan E. Reliability of hearing screening in high-risk neonates: comparative study of otoacoustic emission, automated and conventional auditory brainstem response. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:869-76.