Introduction
Vestibular neuritis (VN) is a peripheral vestibulopathy due to a sudden loss of vestibular function presenting with severe vertigo lasting over 24 hours, usually accompanied by nausea and vomiting. We recently demonstrated that acute vestibular loss could be caused by canalith jam [
1,
2], so we prefer to maintain the term “vestibular neuritis” to indicate an acute ischemic or viral vestibular loss. VN is characterized by spontaneous unidirectional nystagmus (SUN) beating towards the unaffected ear, positive bed-side head impulse test (HIT) on the horizontal plane and reduced or absent caloric response on the involved side. Auditory function and central nervous system (CNS) are generally spared. Complete symptoms relief usually occurs within six months from the onset [
3,
4]. Although the cause of VN is uncertain, it is thought to result from two different etiopathogenetic mechanisms: an inflammation involving the entire vestibular nerve or one of its divisions (presumably due to a viral reactivation) [
3,
4] or an acute ischemia confined in the territory supplied by the anterior vestibular artery [
5-
7]. Nowadays, thanks to the recent introduction of fast devices for vestibular testing, information about the activity of peripheral sensors and afferents can be easily provided. The interpretation of data obtained combining the results of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) [
8] and video-HIT [
9] allows an accurate assessment of otolith and semicircular canals involvement, respectively, enabling the identification of specific patterns of lesion affecting labyrinthine end-organs or vestibular nerve divisions.
Bilateral sequential vestibular neuritis (BSVN) is a rare occurrence described in 1.9-5.3% of patients who previously developed a VN [
10-
12]. Contralateral recurrence of VN has been documented after a variable period from the prior event [
10-
14]. According to the English literature, few cases of BSVN [
10-
15] and two patients with simultaneous bilateral VN [
16,
17] have been reported so far. Given the rarity of reported cases, literature is still lacking in quantitative assessment of semicircular canals and otolith involvement. Here we describe the clinical presentation and the instrumental work-up in four cases of BSVN and discuss the possible underlying etiopathogenetic mechanisms.
Discussion
BSVN is a rare condition. According to literature, only 1.9-5.3% of patients with VN develops a bilateral involvement with different onset time for each affected ear [
10-
12], whereas a relapse rate on the ipsilateral side has been documented in up to 16.7% of patients with VN [
19,
20]. In this study, we found four cases of BSVN (3 males and 1 female, mean age 47.0±17.6 years, range 28-63 years). All patients fulfilled criteria for VN in each occasion based on clinical diagnosis on prolonged vertigo, horizontal SUN, positive HIT and lack of auditory system or CNS involvement [
3,
4]. In accordance with literature, the first manifestation appeared variable period (ranging from few days to four years) before involvement of the second ear [
10-
15] and recurrence was generally less symptomatic compared to the first episode [
11,
15]. Since vestibular hypofunction can either restore or persist after VN [
19,
20], this different behavior may explain the different symptomatology reported by the same patient during each episode of VN. In fact, while in case of functional recovery from the first VN contralateral recurrence should result in the same severity of symptoms as the prior manifestation (as for Case 4 in our report), if vestibular loss persists at the time of the second event both labyrinths lack in function and gait ataxia, unsteadiness and oscillopsia should prevail (as for the other 3 patients). BSVN can indeed account for a small percentage of cases with bilateral vestibular loss, condition generally associated with ototoxic drugs, autoimmune inner ear diseases or bilateral Ménière’s disease [
21]. All three patients from our report who did not restore vestibular function from the first episode developed spontaneous horizontal nystagmus beating towards this side during contralateral VN, despite persistent vestibular hypofunction. This phenomenon was first described by Bechterew after sequential disruption of both labyrinths in animal experiments, and it is thought to be due to the action of compensation mechanisms used by CNS after acute onset of vestibular asymmetry [
22] rather than to residual vestibular activity on the side of the first event.
The aetiology of VN is still a matter of debate. A viral genesis is strongly suspected due to its pathological similarity to reported cases of herpes zoster oticus and frequent connections between VN and previous infections of the upper respiratory tract. The superior division of the vestibular nerve, that innervates the SSC, the LSC and the utricle (i.e., superior labyrinth), has demonstrated to be more frequently involved than the inferior branch collecting PSC and saccular afferents (inferior labyrinth) [
23]. Possible explanations to this selective vulnerability rely on the different anatomy of the bony channels of the vestibular nerves and on a selective tropism for viral agents that leads the superior division to be more susceptible to injuries [
23-
25]. Another possible etiopathogenetic factor for VN is an ischemic damage in the labyrinth. In support of this assumption, a significantly higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was found in patients with VN in comparison to the general population [
26] and unilateral CP on calorics was detected in approximately half of patients with vertebrobasilar insufficiency [
6]. Vascular damage in the inner ear could reflect either a more extensive deficiency in the posterior fossa perfusion or a more selective alteration of the microcirculation in the peripheral receptor, generally lacking in collateralizations [
6,
7]. Based on anatomical studies, the anterior vestibular artery is the smallest terminal branch of the internal auditory artery and is equipped by little collateral circulation [
27], representing the most likely candidate site accounting for isolated vertigo of vascular origin. As it supplies mostly the same structures innervated by the superior vestibular nerve [
7,
27], an ischemic damage at this level is hardly distinguishable from superior VN. In both cases, PSC and most saccular function is generally preserved. Given the multifocal ischemic leukoencephalopathy confirmed by MRI in Case 3, we hypothesized a selective sequential microischemia involving both anterior vestibular arteries to be the most likely mechanism accounting for BSVN in this patient. Conversely, imaging showed a bilateral sequential neural involvement in Case 2, confirming a bilateral VN in this case. In fact, Ramsay-Hunt syndrome is a well-known condition generally attributed to a reactivation of herpes zoster virus (HZV) at the geniculate ganglion, and it is characterized by severe ear pain, vesicular eruptions within the external auditory canal and peripheral VII CN paralysis. Other CN such as V, VIII, IX, XI, and XII could be involved. Connections between facial and vestibular nerves within the internal auditory canal can explain the association of VN with Ramsay-Hunt syndrome and other unexpected vestibular disturbances associated with facial paralysis [
23,
28]. For the other two patients in our report, neither history nor imaging suggested certain or likely causes for BSVN.
In agreement with literature concerning VN [
4,
23,
25], the majority of overall sequential acute episodes in our report documented a sure involvement of the superior vestibular nerve basing on video-HIT data. In one case a VN due to HZV reactivation selectively spared the SSC afferents though involving both vestibular nerve divisions. Only in Case 3 utricular and saccular function were tested with ocular and cervical-VEMPs, respectively, confirming a selective functional preservation of the inferior vestibular nerve. Residual activity for both PSC could likely account for the slight pure up-beating nystagmus increased by skull vibration that was detected in this patient after the second VN. In fact, both SSC and LSC hypofunction likely resulted in an unopposed excitation of both PSC with mastoid vibration. The resulting symmetrical and selective activation of both active PSC could lead to the onset of a pure up-beating nystagmus [
16].
Utricular injury and residual activity in the PSC represent the pathophysiological background for the so-called LindsayHemenway syndrome [
5]. This condition accounts for PSCBPPV following a VN and it is thought to develop in case of superior VN where a utricular damage results in otoliths release into a functionally preserved PSC. Though originally attributed to an ischemic insult in the territory supplied by the anterior vestibular artery [
5], it has been also described in 9.8-15.3% of VN, likely as a consequence of a direct macular damage or nerve deafferentation [
11,
15,
18]. Two patients from our report developed BPPV following a VN (i.e., 25% of overall sequential acute episodes). In both cases, BPPV occurred after the latest manifestation and more than one PRM was needed to treat positional vertigo, as reported in literature [
15,
18]. While in Case 1 aetiology could not be ascertained and both superior VN and labyrinthine infarction could be hypothesized, anterior vestibular artery ischemia could likely account for the clinical scenario in Case 3. It is interesting to notice that a mild functional impairment for the PSC could be found in both cases after successful PRM for BPPV. A reduction of VOR gain for the PSC may reflect a progression in labyrinthine damage, either due to microvascular disease in small arterial branches supplying PSC or to posterior ampulla deafferentation. Since observing a PSC-BPPV after a VN implies a functional preservation of the PSC ampulla, it is possible to assume that, despite instrumental findings, ampullary function could be enough preserved to allow a severe canalolithiasis to occur. Alternatively, any selective lesion to irregular afferents could hypothetically result in a dissociation between high- and low-frequency domains, impeding PSC to respond to high-frequency stimuli (video-HIT), whereas preserved regular fibers would allow the cupula to be stimulated by low-frequency stimuli (free-floating otoconia) [
29]. On the other hand, slightly reduced VOR-gain values with small covert saccades of the PSC (functionally coupled with contralateral affected SSC) in cases with selective involvement of superior vestibular nerve or superior labyrinthine ischemia are also in line with studies on contralesional canal activity following VN showing, on average, mild impaired activity in the healthy side. In fact, abnormalities detected on contralesional PSC plots may be likely explained by severely reduced activity for injured SSC. It is still unclear whether peripheral phenomena (i.e., functional loss of the “push-pull” mechanism) or central compensation (i.e., cerebellar “shut-down”) may account for these findings. Probably, whereas the first theory may explain reduced PSC VOR-gain in acute stage, the latter phenomenon may likely explain PSC abnormalities in those patients with long-lasting symptoms.
Nevertheless, according to our findings, BPPV seems to occur more frequently in BSVN than in isolated cases of VN (50% compared to 9.8-15.3%, respectively). These findings can reflect a tendency for inner ears of patient with BSVN to feature an extremely susceptible neural or vascular system.
In conclusion, we described four cases of BSVN and discussed the significance of our findings with respect to the literature review. Clinicians should keep in mind that both VN and labyrinthine ischemia can occur bilaterally in a sequential pattern, although rarely and in a small proportion of patients compared with unilateral VN. Brain imaging should always be given as it may help in the identification of specific causes for BSVN besides excluding CNS involvement. Video-HIT and VEMPs represent a noninvasive test battery offering a comprehensive assessment of receptors and afferents involvement. As they are rapid tools for vestibular testing, we suggest clinicians using them to follow the vestibular function of patients with unilateral VN or BSVN in order to evaluate functional recovery over time to predict possible recurrences or late onset of BPPV.