Evaluation of the Interaural Attenuation for Pure Tone Audiometry in Korean. |
Young Joo Park, Kye Hoon Park, Go Eun Jun, Sol Kil Oh, Chi Kyou Lee |
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Haspital, Cheonan, Korea. earpark@gmail.com |
|
|
Abstract |
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The masking should be used in pure tone audiometry when the difference between the air-conduction threshold of the tested ear and the bone-conduction threshold of the non-tested ear is more than interaural attenuation (IA). But the standardized average value of IA in Korean has not been evaluated until now. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the interaural attenuation in Korean population.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Of the patients who visited our department from March, 2007 to August, 2009, 44 patients were selected who had unilateral severe sensorineural hearing loss or deafness and contralateral normal hearing. When the difference between air-conduction threshold with and without masking was more than 10 dB, the interaural attenuation at each frequency was obtained by subtracting the contralateral bone conduction from the air-conduction threshold without masking.
RESULTS The interaural attenuations at each frequency were 45-75 dB (250 Hz), 50-75 dB (500 Hz), 40-75 dB (1 kHz), 45-85 dB (2 kHz), 50-90 dB (4 kHz). 77.2% of the subjects showed interaural attenuation of 55-65 dB at 250 Hz, and 80.9% in 50-60 dB at 500 Hz, 79.5% in 55-65 dB at 1 kHz, 83.4% in 45-60 dB at 2 kHz, and 76.4% in 50-65 dB at 4 kHz.
Most of the patients were distributed 15-25 dB higher than the minimal interaural attenuation at 1 kHz. At 2 kHz and 4 kHz, most of the patients were distributed around 15 dB of the minimal interaural attenuation.
CONCLUSIONS These results can be used as reference values for masking of pure tone audiometry. But, further studies with large population should be done to get more precise results and contributing factors to IA values. |
Keywords:
Interaural attenuation;Masking;Korean |
REFERENCES
-
Snyder JM. Interaural attenuation characteristics in audiometry. Laryngoscope 1973;83:1847-55.
-
Chaiklin JB. Interaural attenuation and cross-hearing in air conduction audiometry. J Aud Res 1967;7:413-24.
-
Megerian CA, Burkard RF, Ravicz ME. A method for determining interaural attenuation in animal models of asymmetric hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 1996;1:214-9.
-
Katz J, Lezynski J. Clinical masking. In: Katz J, editor. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2002. p.124-41.
-
Clark WW, Bohne BA. Attenuation and protection provided by ossicular removal. J Acoust Soc Am 1987;81:1093-9.
-
Mast TE. Binaural interaction and contralateral inhibition in dorsal cochlear nucleus of the chinchilla. J Neurophysiol 1970;33:108-15.
-
Teas DC, Nielsen DW. Interaural attenuation versus frequency for guinea pig and chinchilla CM response. J Acoust Soc Am 1975;58:1066-72.
-
Hall JW 3rd, Grose JH. The effect of conductive hearing loss on the masking-level difference: insert versus standard earphones. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:2652-7.
-
Munro KJ, Agnew N. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone. Br J Audiol 1999;33:259-62.
-
Sklare DA, Denenberg LJ. Interaural attenuation for tubephone insert earphones. Ear Hear 1987;8:298-300.
|
|