1. Hall JW III. eHandbook of auditory evoked responses: principles, procedures & protocols. Pretoria: Pearson;2015. p.1–1749.
2. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B, Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:220–36.
3. Choi SW. Perception and production of Korean lax, tense, and aspirated consonants: focused on Chinese learners. Studies in Linguistics 2018;47:21–36.
4. Agung K, Purdy SC, McMahon CM, Newall P. The use of cortical auditory evoked potentials to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2006;17:559–72.
5. Reynolds M, Jefferson L. Natural and synthetic speech comprehension: comparison of children from two age groups. Augment Altern Comm 1999;15:174–82.
6. Cutler A, Dahan D, van Donselaar W. Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review. Lang Speech 1997;40:141–201.
7. Raphael LJ, Borden GJ, Harris KS. Speech science primer: physiology, acoustics, and perception of speech. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2007. p.1–346.
8. Tremblay KL, Friesen L, Martin BA, Wright R. Test-retest reliability of cortical evoked potentials using naturally produced speech sounds. Ear Hear 2003;24:225–32.
9. Shaywitz SE. Overcoming dyslexia: a new and complete science-based program for reading problems at any level. New York: Vintage Books;2003. p.1–432.
10. Onishi S, Davis H. Effects of duration and rise time of tone bursts on evoked V potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 1968;44:582–91.
11. Swink S, Stuart A. Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2012;55:447–59.
12. Gölgeli A, Süer C, Ozesmi C, Dolu N, Aşcioğlu M, Sahin O. The effect of sex differences on event-related potentials in young adults. Int J Neurosci 1999;99:69–77.
13. Klatt DH. Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. J Acoust Soc Am 1980;67:971–95.
15. Wunderlich JL, Cone-Wesson BK, Shepherd R. Maturation of the cortical auditory evoked potential in infants and young children. Hear Res 2006;212:185–202.
16. Ritter W, Simson R, Vaughan HG Jr. Event-related potential correlates of two stages of information processing in physical and semantic discrimination tasks. Psychophysiology 1983;20:168–79.
17. Rufener KS, Liem F, Meyer M. Age-related differences in auditory evoked potentials as a function of task modulation during speech-non-speech processing. Brain Behav 2014;4:21–8.
18. Boersma P, van Heuven V. Speak and unspeak with PRAAT. Glot International 2001;5:341–5.
19. Swanson HL. Individual differences in working memory: a model testing and subgroup analysis of learning-disabled and skilled readers. Intelligence 1993;17:285–332.
20. Cambron NK, Wilson RH, Shanks JE. Spondaic word detection and recognition functions for female and male speakers. Ear Hear 1991;12:64–70.
21. Prakash H, Abraham A, Rajashekar B, Yerraguntla K. The effect of intensity on the speech evoked auditory late latency response in normal hearing individuals. J Int Adv Otol 2016;12:67–71.
23. Näätänen R, Simpson M, Loveless NE. Stimulus deviance and evoked potentials. Biol Psychol 1982;14:53–98.
24. Tremblay KL, Shahin AJ, Picton T, Ross B. Auditory training alters the physiological detection of stimulus-specific cues in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120:128–35.
25. Burger M, Hoppe U, Lohscheller J, Eysholdt U, Döllinger M. The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms. Ear Hear 2009;30:16–22.
26. Noh H, Lee DH. Cross-language identification of long-term average speech spectra in Korean and English: toward a better understanding of the quantitative difference between two languages. Ear Hear 2012;33:441–3.
27. Chen SH. The effects of tones on speaking frequency and intensity ranges in Mandarin and Min dialects. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:3225–30.
28. Kim EO, Lim D. Effects of word difficulty and talkers on monosyllabic word recognition tests. Audiol 2006;2:102–6.
31. Phillips MD, Lowe MJ, Lurito JT, Dzemidzic M, Mathews VP. Temporal lobe activation demonstrates sex-based differences during passive listening. Radiology 2001;220:202–7.
32. Jang HJ, Kyung BP, Lee DL, Lee WB, Ryu SH. Considering elements of game design based on leaner’s gender. KOCON 2011;11:128–36.